Le gouvernement devrait cesser d’investir dans le Fonds des générations

L’IRIS met à jour ses données sur la dette du Québec

Alors que le gouvernement du Québec s’apprête à déposer son budget, l’Institut de recherche et d’informations socioéconomiques (IRIS) publie une brochure qui montre, entre autres, que les investissements majeurs dans le Fonds des générations ne constituent pas une stratégie appropriée pour l’économie du Québec en ce moment. Nous actualisons également nos données sur la dette du Québec. En regard des autres économies avancées, le niveau d’endettement du Québec est resté relativement stable entre 2013 et 2015. En classant les économies de la plus endettée à la moins, la dette brute du Québec reste faible (22e position sur 35) et sa dette nette demeure très faible (21e position sur 27). Cependant, lorsqu’on lui attribue une part de la dette fédérale, la dette brute est en légère hausse, passant de la catégorie des dettes moyennes basses en 2013 (11e) aux dettes moyennes hautes en 2015 (9e). Même chose pour la dette nette qui progresse des dettes faibles (15e) aux dettes sous la moyenne (14e). S’il y a une hausse de l’endettement relatif du Québec, elle est donc d’abord causée par l’endettement du gouvernement fédéral qu’on lui attribute.

Lire la brochure

General Assembly Agenda

March 27, 2017
F216 Supper 5:30
GA 6:30


1.Approval of Agenda

2.Approval of Minutes Jan. 31, 2017

3.Business Arising
a)Cont Ed Resources for Full-Time Contracts
b)Teacher Resources for Students with Special Needs
c)VCTA Release Time
d)Colour Consultation

4.Reports & Announcements:
a)Program Management Policy
b)VCTA Elections

5.New Business
a)Academic Council: Bylaw 3
b)Academic Council Committees




CRT Agenda

Meeting to be held on Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. in Room F-216

  1. Adoption of Agenda
  2. Approval of Minutes
  3. Business Arising
    1. RFA and final allocations 2015-16
    2. Faculty allocations 2016-17
    3. Strike pay cut sent back to Québec
    4. Local agreement on withdrawing leave requests
    5. Program Management and Continuing Education
    6. Standing committees of Academic Council and IPESA
    7. Local Agreement on VCTA Release
    8. Grievance VAN-2016-12-10
    9. Minutes
  4. New Business
    1. Selection Committees
    2. S048
    3. Statutory holidays 2017-2018
    4. Vacation period and Transfer of Availability
  5. Adjournment

Association Council Agenda

Thursday, March 30, 2017
ROOM F-216 at 1:30 pm – 4:00 pm


  1. Approval of Agenda
  2. Approval of Minutes: February 2, 2017 & March 2, 2017
  3. Business Arising
    1. By-law 3
    2. Program Management Policy (PMP)
    3. Teacher Resources for Student with Special Needs
    4. CRT report
      1. Selection Committee for grievance
      2. Cont Ed charges and AEC
      3. Separate Program Management Policy for Cont Ed
      4. IPESA
    5. VCTA release campaign
  4. Reports & Announcements
    1. Sexual Violence Policy
    2. Academic Dean
  5. New business
    1. VCTA Elections: naming of Elections Officer and scrutineers
    2. Writing Center Pilot Project (with three (3) Gen Ed teachers)
  6. Members` Concerns
  7. Varia
  8. In camera
  9. Adjournment




Workload Distribution in Departments

Every year in March, the college predicts the number of students in each course and sends this to departmental coordinators. Departments can decide to change the courses given, but the amount of allocation is fixed unless the department can demonstrate a good reason for more allocation. The department then has to distribute the workload equitably (8-6:03) among the teachers in the department (i.e.who teaches which courses) over the academic year.  Tenured teachers have to be covered first and then non-tenured teachers by priority. It should be noted that having a right to workload does not mean that any particular teachers have the right to individual courses. Departments should decide on a method of dividing up the workload and coordinators are given the responsibility of actually doing this and submitting it to the department. (Article 4-1:10).

Many departments have found an equitable way to distribute workload by first having each teacher submit their ranked choices to the department, meaning that each department member is aware of everyone’s choices and no teacher is guaranteed choices over anyone else. Then the actual workload distribution proposal is done, on an equitable basis, by the Coordinator/s  and presented to the department.  If your department has not formalized rules under which to operate, we urge you to do so, as soon as possible. The Fneeq document “A Look at Departments” can be a very useful document to help departments to make such rules. It can be found below



If you have any questions about workload distribution, please come and see a VCTA executive member in C101.

Academic Council Agenda

Friday, March 3, 2017, 1:00 p.m.

Room F-216

      1. Welcome and Introductions
      2. Approval of the Agenda
      3. Approval of the Minutes of December 2, 2016
      4. Business Arising from the Minutes
        1. Standing Committees and Working Groups of Academic Council – Report (D. Nyisztor)
      5. Main Business
        1. Items for Recommendation
          1. By-Law No. 3 (E. Lozowy)
        2. Items for Consultation
          1. Complementary Courses Procedure & Course Recommendation (E. Lozowy)
          2. Teaching Excellence Guidelines (D. Lafaille)
      6. Reports, Announcements and Correspondence
        1. February 2017 Board of Directors Meeting (D. Lafaille)
        2. CEEC Update (D. Lafaille)
        3. Winter 2017 Enrolment Update (T. Ingerman)
        4. Cheating and Plagiarism Report (T. Ingerman)
        5. Joint Coordinators’ Report to Academic Council (D. Nyisztor)
        6. Learning Commons Update (H. Kavallos)
      7. Varia
      8. Adjournment


Academic Space
Diane Nyisztor
Marie Gribbon
Stephen Newbigging

By-Law No. 3 (Ad-Hoc)
Julie Plante
Stephen Newbigging

Cafeteria User Committee
Amanda Horton

Complementary Course Committee
Alan Wong
Karl Laroche
Marlene Eberhart

International Education Standing Committee Teacher
Richard Klopp  
Ruby Viray
Sylvie Trudel

Library Standing Committee Teacher Members
Cathy Mott
Judy Ingerman
Lilian Liganor

Policy Advisory
Diane Nyisztor
Rick Braley
Stephen Newbigging

Research Ethics Board
Bonnie Sonnenschein
Maggie McDonnell
Nicola McEnroe

Teaching Excellence Committee
Nicola McEnroe
Mehdi Shallwani

Contractual Obligations

In our Collective Agreement (Article 8-4:01 -Type 1 activities ), there are a certain number of tasks that are considered “contractual obligations” that all teachers are expected to do, from tenured teachers with lots of seniority to brand new non-tenured teachers. The most important duty we must perform is teaching our full courses, but know that holding office hours and attending department meetings are also notable contractual obligations.*

Although this may seem obvious, it bears repeating that teachers  are expected to give all of the classes, labs and stages.  If you are unable to do so, you must officially either cancel your class on Omnivox or signal your absence on Omnivox and get a substitute teacher.  You may also replace the class with a field trip, or guest speaker, etc., having clearly indicated this change to the students.  When you are unsure if you are contractually permitted to do something, play it safe and consult your Dean to see if he or she accepts the activity.  Furthermore, be aware that the teacher is expected to give the whole class, lab or stage and should students complain that a teacher does not show up, comes late or cuts classes short, there could be a serious problem for the teacher, since this is a violation of your contractual obligations.* (As a courtesy, teachers should end their class 10-15 minutes before the end of the block to facilitate timely arrival to following classes). 

Should you find yourself called in to talk to the administration about this or any other disciplinary matter, make sure that you take a union rep with you. However, if you are not upholding your contractual obligations, the administration has the right to apply disciplinary action and  the union can do little except ensure that the teacher has due process and is treated fairly, according to the articles of the  Fneeq Collective Agreement.  In the past year or so, we have had incidences where teachers were found to have violated their contractual obligations and in consequence faced pay cuts, summative evaluations and even withdrawal of the hiring priority for a non-tenured teacher. These situations hurt our profession and are painful to go through for all of us and so we urge you to avoid them.

* For the full list of contractual obligations, look at Art. 8-4.01 (p. 184): http://www.thevcta.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2015-2020-Convention-Collective-FNEEQ-2015-2020-EN.pdf


How to lose your job without trying: ATTENTION ALL NON-TENURED TEACHERS

All non-tenured teachers must put in a GOS (General Offer of Service) during the month of April for the following year.

If you forget to do so, you must apply to each and every posting in your area during the next year, unless you have a full-time contract for the year. If you forget to apply to a particular posting, you do not have priority for the workload and the next person on the list gets your job, if they have a GOS in or have applied to the posting. Someone on the priority list in your discipline can then pass you on the seniority list.

Please put a note on your calendars and phones now to remind you to put in the GOS. At the beginning of April, HR will send out a reminder and the necessary forms. Make sure that you fill them in and send them back to HR or you are risking your job next year.